Harriet Martineau who is often regard as the first female
sociologist, really made a name for herself when she introduced her view on
society to the world. Her ideas such as
the “laws” of social life and morals and manners are especially interesting to
me. They are interesting because it
basically explain how people should act in society. Martineau “laws” of social life says that
human happiness is express through the fairness of our society. What I got out from this is that if the
government (society) treat everyone citizen equally, then people would in
theory be happier. Happy people mean
more productive people, and with more productive people then the government’s
economy can thrive. However this is also
one of her greatest critique, mainly because of the vagueness of the idea
itself. Although the idea does look good
on paper, is it possible to achieve? We
live in a capitalist government where everyone is in for themselves, thus
rendering this idea useless. The example
in class about the country Bhutan shows that a government measuring people’s
happiness would not last long. Secondly
is her idea of morals and manners, and this idea is pretty self-explanatory. It’s about the shared norms that people of a
particular society have, and the action that we take based on those norms. I really like the example that we use in
class about men needing space in between urinals. There are no written rules that say that no
two men should ever pee next to each other.
However, in our society we view going to the bathroom a private matter. Thus when going to use the urinal in public
we like to give them space, so things don’t get awkward. I thought of the image
below when the idea came up in class and I believe it helps demonstrate this
idea.
No comments:
Post a Comment